5 Comments
User's avatar
Om Prakash Pant's avatar

This reminded me that apprenticeship wasn't really about writing code.

It was about being close enough to production decisions, failures, and trade-offs that you started seeing how experienced engineers thought.

If AI removes those experiences, we can't assume the learning will happen on its own.

Sumant Thakur's avatar

That’s a very important distinction.

Apprenticeship was never only about writing code. It was about being close to production decisions, failures, trade-offs, and the reasoning behind them.

Agents can accelerate the work, but juniors still need opportunities to experience that reasoning directly. Otherwise, we may improve output while weakening the path through which engineering judgment develops.

Shivam Singh's avatar

Thanks for such a deep internal analysis, this is truly helpful for juniors like me.

From this article it's been verified that going through basic route while learning is still a critical skills to have. There's a very common trap among newbies they lean more toward agents rather than finding solutions themselves.

This article teaches most basic yet critical system of going through developer journey.

Sumant Thakur's avatar

Thank you, I’m glad the article resonated with you.

I agree that learning the fundamentals still matters deeply. Agents can accelerate the journey, but they should not replace the struggle of understanding how systems work, debugging failures, and making decisions independently.

The real goal is to use agents as a learning partner, not as a substitute for learning.

Shivam Singh's avatar

Absolutely true use of agents should be as learning partner rather than substitute of learning.

Looking forward for more such helpful advices.